PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 49.55% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 1.39% return.


AIPO

1D
-4.86%
1M
2.22%
YTD
49.55%
6M
45.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBTP

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and PBTP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIPOPBTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.62

AIPO vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-5.44%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-0.76%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-0.75%

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

Volatility

AIPO vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

1.62%

+33.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.59%

2.85%

+32.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

2.64%

+32.95%

AIPO vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PBTP's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
4.82%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and PBTP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.07% for PBTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer