AIPO vs. IBOT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBOT.

Performance

AIPO vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 24.30% return.

AIPO

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: 42.18%
• 6M: 37.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBOT

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 6M: 24.91%
• 1Y: 50.85%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	42.18%	9.46%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	24.30%	10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and IBOT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.75

AIPO vs. IBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIPO	IBOT
Industrials	54.2%	42.9%
Technology	19.8%	52.0%
Utilities	13.5%	-
Energy	6.0%	2.3%
Financial Services	4.8%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

AIPO vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 71
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIPO	IBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.67	—

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum IBOT drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and IBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIPO	IBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-25.39%	+8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.74%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-2.92%	-4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-5.02%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIPO	IBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.17%	23.06%	+12.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.17%	22.37%	+12.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.17%	22.37%	+12.80%

AIPO vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIPO vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IBOT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.31%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIPO and IBOT in my portfolio?

AIPO and IBOT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIPO or IBOT?

On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIPO or IBOT?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIPO or IBOT?

IBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

What is the main difference between AIPO and IBOT?

AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while IBOT is Technology Equities. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.47% for IBOT.