PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.39% return.


AIPO

1D
3.42%
1M
-4.58%
6M
20.17%
YTD
33.86%
1Y
46.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
45.22%

IBID

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.18%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.27M$38.04M$47.00M
$770.97K$775.91K$730.76K

AIPO vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and IBID is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIPO
AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIPO vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIPOIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.66

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

6.50

-4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

22.86

-16.45

AIPO vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIPO and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.36%

-1.28%

-23.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.36%

-0.55%

-23.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.84%

-0.11%

-14.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-0.22%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

0.16%

+7.17%

Volatility

AIPO vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that AIPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

0.32%

+14.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

0.92%

+28.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.61%

1.16%

+36.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

2.21%

+35.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

2.21%

+35.06%

AIPO vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IBID's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
4.90%4.43%4.24%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and IBID have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIPO dropped -24.36% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 3.56% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer