AIPO vs. FTSD
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. AIPO is passively managed, while FTSD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
AIPO vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 49.55% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.92% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 49.55%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
AIPO vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 49.55% | 9.46% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.92% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and FTSD is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTSD
AIPO vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIPO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 35.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -5.32% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -0.21% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -0.60% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.59% | 1.35% | +34.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 1.86% | +33.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 1.76% | +33.83% |
AIPO vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and FTSD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.25% for FTSD.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer