PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIP vs. SIMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIP vs. SIMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIP achieves a 124.32% return, which is significantly lower than SIMO's 254.12% return.


AIP

1D
-3.71%
1M
-15.20%
6M
101.80%
YTD
124.32%
1Y
282.51%
3Y*
70.38%
5Y*
10Y*

SIMO

1D
0.64%
1M
16.35%
6M
190.19%
YTD
254.12%
1Y
352.35%
3Y*
76.93%
5Y*
41.45%
10Y*
22.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIP vs. SIMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIP
Arteris, Inc.
124.32%52.11%73.01%36.98%-79.63%27.86%
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
254.12%76.91%-8.94%-4.91%-30.38%36.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AIP and SIMO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

0.40

The correlation between AIP and SIMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIP:

$1.61B

SIMO:

$10.95B

EPS

AIP:

-$0.79

SIMO:

$17.91

PS Ratio

AIP:

19.87

SIMO:

2.76

PB Ratio

AIP:

611.19

SIMO:

3.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIP:

$76.98M

SIMO:

$997.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIP:

$68.36M

SIMO:

$485.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

AIP:

-$31.26M

SIMO:

$146.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIP vs. SIMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIP
AIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SIMO
SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIP vs. SIMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIPSIMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.64

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.85

13.20

-5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.62

38.63

-22.00

AIP vs. SIMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is lower than the SIMO Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIP and SIMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIP vs. SIMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIP drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, smaller than the maximum SIMO drawdown of -93.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIP and SIMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPSIMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.63%

-93.19%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.54%

-26.26%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.48%

-52.84%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.44%

-3.13%

-25.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-32.27%

-30.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.76%

8.97%

+7.79%

Volatility

AIP vs. SIMO - Volatility Comparison

Arteris, Inc. (AIP) has a higher volatility of 37.19% compared to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) at 23.43%. This indicates that AIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPSIMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.19%

23.43%

+13.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.28%

58.68%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.09%

72.84%

+20.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.26%

51.21%

+30.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.26%

45.63%

+35.63%

Dividends

AIP vs. SIMO - Dividend Comparison

AIP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIP
Arteris, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
0.61%2.16%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.62%2.89%2.45%3.45%1.68%1.51%1.88%

Financials

AIP vs. SIMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arteris, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
22.94M
278.46M
(AIP) Total Revenue
(SIMO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AIP vs. SIMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arteris, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
85.8%
49.1%
Portfolio components
AIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.69M and revenue of 22.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.

SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

AIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported an operating income of -9.30M and revenue of 22.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

AIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported a net income of -7.96M and revenue of 22.94M, resulting in a net margin of -34.7%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIP and SIMO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIP has higher volatility (37.19%) compared to SIMO (23.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIP dropped -87.63% vs SIMO's -93.19%.

SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 3.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIP and SIMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer