PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. BOTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -6.60% return.


AINF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.37%
6M
29.00%
YTD
38.00%
1Y
67.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.54%

BOTG.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-7.63%
6M
-8.19%
YTD
-6.60%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£1.05M£1.47M£2.79M
£72.65K£114.54K£149.68K

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and BOTG.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024

0.69

The correlation between AINF.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AINF.LBOTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.02

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

-0.01

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

-0.02

+4.11

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -57.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and BOTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LBOTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-57.90%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.48%

-20.83%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-32.72%

+17.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-39.13%

+28.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.41%

8.22%

+8.19%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) at 8.70%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LBOTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

8.70%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.95%

22.16%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.63%

26.34%

+24.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.54%

29.79%

+13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.54%

29.79%

+13.75%

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AINF.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINF.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTG.L.

AINF.L tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Net Index, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.L and BOTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer