AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AINF.AS (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AINF.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while R1GR.AS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AINF.AS returned 124.11% vs 26.08% for R1GR.AS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AINF.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for R1GR.AS.

Performance

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's 6.63% return.

AINF.AS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 27.63%
• YTD: 60.14%
• 6M: 61.51%
• 1Y: 124.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

R1GR.AS

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 6.06%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 26.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AINF.AS iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	60.14%	44.70%	-1.33%
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	6.63%	17.57%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and R1GR.AS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024	0.87

The correlation between AINF.AS and R1GR.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.AS

AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 96
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

R1GR.AS

R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 42
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AINF.AS	R1GR.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.96	1.68	+3.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.67	2.42	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.29	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.36	1.64	+8.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.07	5.35	+28.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and R1GR.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AINF.AS	R1GR.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.96	1.68	+3.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.67	1.33	+1.34

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, which is greater than R1GR.AS's maximum drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and R1GR.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINF.AS	R1GR.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.26%	-23.09%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-15.71%	+3.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.36%	+1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-3.34%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	4.84%	-1.24%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) at 4.25%. This indicates that AINF.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AINF.AS	R1GR.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	4.25%	+5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.09%	11.33%	+7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.60%	15.41%	+9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	18.92%	+8.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	18.92%	+8.99%

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINF.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.AS nor R1GR.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINF.AS and R1GR.AS in my portfolio?

AINF.AS and R1GR.AS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AINF.AS or R1GR.AS?

On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINF.AS or R1GR.AS?

R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.AS.

What is the main difference between AINF.AS and R1GR.AS?

AINF.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while R1GR.AS is Large Cap Growth Equities. AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.18% for R1GR.AS.