AIMOX vs. QMHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX).
AIMOX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 8, 2009. QMHIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2013.
Performance
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMOX AQR International Momentum Style Fund | -3.40% | 34.89% | 8.70% | 16.69% | -19.43% | 12.04% | 16.57% | 22.63% | -15.29% | 25.25% |
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund | 14.62% | 19.97% | 10.78% | -0.17% | 50.14% | -2.08% | -0.73% | 1.82% | -14.44% | -1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIMOX achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than QMHIX's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AIMOX has outperformed QMHIX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while QMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.
AIMOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
QMHIX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMOX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIMOX vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank
AIMOX
QMHIX
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIMOX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 2.01 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.45 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.29 | -1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 8.79 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIMOX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.01 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.96 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.33 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMOX and QMHIX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison
AIMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.74%, more than QMHIX's 1.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMOX AQR International Momentum Style Fund | 15.74% | 15.20% | 22.64% | 13.66% | 2.77% | 2.22% | 1.12% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.19% | 2.52% | 1.62% |
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund | 1.79% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 7.66% | 9.34% | 10.96% | 9.52% | 4.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMOX drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum QMHIX drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMOX and QMHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMOX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -39.37% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -8.34% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.23% | -19.06% | -13.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.23% | -34.54% | +2.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -0.62% | -11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -18.05% | +9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.13% | -0.20% |
Volatility
AIMOX vs. QMHIX - Volatility Comparison
AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) at 3.98%. This indicates that AIMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIMOX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 3.98% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 9.98% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 14.16% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.26% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 15.50% | +1.27% |