PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMOX vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIMOX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AIMOX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.29%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.89% annualized return.


AIMOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6.10%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
9.29%

SPMO

1D
1.31%
1M
14.80%
YTD
29.70%
6M
30.19%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
42.80%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
20.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIMOX
AQR International Momentum Style Fund
6.10%34.89%8.70%16.69%-19.43%12.04%16.57%22.63%-15.29%25.25%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.70%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AIMOX and SPMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.65

The correlation between AIMOX and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMOX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMOX
AIMOX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AIMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AIMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIMOXSPMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

2.64

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

3.55

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.76

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

14.67

-5.79

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIMOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIMOX and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIMOXSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.64

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.28

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.03

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.01

-0.62

Drawdowns

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMOX drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMOX and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMOXSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-30.95%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-12.70%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.71%

-20.13%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.23%

-22.74%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

-30.95%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

0.00%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-4.60%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.26%

-0.36%

Volatility

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR International Momentum Style Fund (AIMOX) is 6.18%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that AIMOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMOXSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

7.38%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

14.44%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

17.65%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

19.31%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

20.31%

-3.42%

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMOX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIMOX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

AIMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.85%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIMOX
AQR International Momentum Style Fund
20.85%15.20%22.64%13.66%2.77%2.22%1.12%2.34%2.17%2.19%2.52%1.62%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIMOX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to AIMOX (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIMOX dropped -32.23% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMOX and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer