PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. NRJL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AII.TO is traded in CAD, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 94.37% return, which is significantly higher than NRJL.L's 41.34% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has outperformed NRJL.L with an annualized return of 48.01%, while NRJL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.


AII.TO

1D
2.40%
1M
-14.19%
YTD
94.37%
6M
93.56%
1Y
132.74%
3Y*
196.50%
5Y*
71.64%
10Y*
48.01%

NRJL.L

1D
2.23%
1M
1.27%
YTD
41.34%
6M
40.48%
1Y
79.33%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
94.37%784.25%68.52%-20.59%-23.60%39.06%52.38%-35.38%18.18%103.70%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
41.34%39.04%-5.67%-20.73%-13.33%-6.31%33.92%46.91%-5.66%17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and NRJL.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2010

0.06

Over the past year, AII.TO and NRJL.L have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NRJL.L
NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AII.TONRJL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.56

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

7.89

-5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

25.63

-20.57

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and NRJL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -55.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and NRJL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AII.TONRJL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-55.22%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.79%

-10.00%

-44.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.79%

-34.83%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.43%

-50.34%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-51.73%

-16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.85%

-3.05%

-23.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-25.13%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.31%

3.08%

+23.23%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 31.36% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 10.07%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AII.TONRJL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.36%

10.07%

+21.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.35%

18.95%

+48.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.99%

22.33%

+76.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.65%

24.44%

+50.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.28%

24.16%

+51.12%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison

AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.30%0.42%0.73%0.77%0.24%0.32%0.70%1.02%0.59%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


AII.TO and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AII.TO and NRJL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer