PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGYX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIGYX having a 11.71% return and PRRSX slightly higher at 12.29%. Over the past 10 years, AIGYX has outperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.


AIGYX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
11.71%
6M
9.06%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
8.04%

PRRSX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
11.71%4.20%9.61%13.34%-24.99%62.09%-6.59%27.80%-7.59%8.52%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.29%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGYX and PRRSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.94

The correlation between AIGYX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGYX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGYX
AIGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AIGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGYXPRRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.73

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

5.95

+0.98

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGYX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGYXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.10

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.19

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.30

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.35

+0.04

Drawdowns

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGYX drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGYX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGYXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.94%

-77.82%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-9.05%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-17.77%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.20%

-37.14%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.10%

-45.75%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-3.11%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.42%

-13.09%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.62%

-0.38%

Volatility

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) is 4.11%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that AIGYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGYXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.33%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

10.18%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

14.26%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

20.20%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

21.87%

+0.08%

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGYX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGYX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

AIGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
7.57%8.43%12.69%4.01%8.97%27.57%16.28%18.30%49.34%5.85%5.48%4.69%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AIGYX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to AIGYX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIGYX dropped -79.94% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

AIGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGYX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer