AIGP.L vs. SLV
AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Precious Metals, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGP.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for SLV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIGP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGP.L achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGP.L has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 12.03%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
SLV
- 1D
- -8.08%
- 1M
- -12.21%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 89.74%
- 3Y*
- 41.68%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.36% | 78.63% | 23.25% | 7.81% | -0.87% | -7.48% | 23.72% | 17.09% | -5.55% | 7.63% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.42% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGP.L and SLV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AIGP.L and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (10 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGP.L vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
AIGP.L
SLV
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGP.L | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.13 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 4.51 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGP.L | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.52 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.53 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGP.L drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGP.L and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGP.L | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -76.28% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -42.45% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -42.45% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -42.45% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.53% | -42.81% | +15.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -41.70% | +21.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -44.67% | +17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 19.98% | -10.57% |
Volatility
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) is 8.30%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 17.11%. This indicates that AIGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGP.L | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 17.11% | -8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.82% | 58.94% | -31.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 59.50% | -28.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 36.32% | -14.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 31.94% | -11.87% |
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGP.L vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGP.L nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGP.L and SLV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIGP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
AIGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLV is Silver. AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGP.L and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for AIGP.L and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer