AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIGO.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGO.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past year, AIGO.TO returned 73.53% vs 35.05% for QQCC.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIGO.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for QQCC.TO.

Performance

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGO.TO achieves a 38.42% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's 16.94% return.

AIGO.TO

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 24.23%
• YTD: 38.42%
• 6M: 36.42%
• 1Y: 73.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQCC.TO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 10.18%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 35.05%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF	38.42%	24.70%	19.81%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	16.94%	11.64%	19.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024	0.59

The correlation between AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGO.TO

AIGO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIGO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AIGO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AIGO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AIGO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QQCC.TO

QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIGO.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	2.76	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	3.72	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.50	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	4.32	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	16.04	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is comparable to the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIGO.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30	2.76	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	0.00	+1.77

Drawdowns

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIGO.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.71%	-36.70%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.14%	-8.15%	-8.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	0.00%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-8.37%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.64%	2.19%	+3.45%

Volatility

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that AIGO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIGO.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	3.75%	+4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.85%	10.03%	+7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.43%	12.78%	+9.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.21%	17.58%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	17.29%	+6.92%

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIGO.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

AIGO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QQCC.TO's 10.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF	0.06%	0.09%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	10.48%	11.27%	9.89%	11.85%	11.04%	5.15%	5.84%	6.31%	7.90%	6.01%	6.73%	8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO in my portfolio?

AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIGO.TO or QQCC.TO?

On fees, AIGO.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIGO.TO or QQCC.TO?

AIGO.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

What is the main difference between AIGO.TO and QQCC.TO?

AIGO.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for AIGO.TO and 0.65% for QQCC.TO.