PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGI.L is traded in USD, while IS3N.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS3N.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGI.L achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGI.L has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 6.69%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.


AIGI.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
-4.42%
6M
3.37%
YTD
7.15%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
6.69%

IS3N.DE

1D
-2.01%
1M
-8.49%
6M
9.41%
YTD
15.06%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
8.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGI.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals
7.15%19.45%3.05%-11.75%-2.91%28.67%14.34%6.22%-19.39%26.52%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
15.06%32.24%7.37%10.58%-18.59%-1.36%17.53%18.43%-15.24%37.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGI.L and IS3N.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2014

0.42

The correlation between AIGI.L and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGI.L
AIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGI.LIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.26

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

7.18

-4.39

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGI.L and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGI.L and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGI.LIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.67%

-39.05%

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-12.72%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.72%

-18.38%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.97%

-33.66%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

-39.05%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.73%

-10.52%

-15.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.71%

-13.96%

-29.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

4.02%

+1.87%

Volatility

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) is 6.33%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that AIGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGI.LIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

8.38%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

18.82%

-5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.12%

20.96%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

18.69%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

19.31%

+0.17%

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGI.L vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGI.L nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGI.L and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGI.L.

AIGI.L is categorized as Metals, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. AIGI.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGI.L and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGI.L and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer