PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGI.L is traded in USD, while AMPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGI.L achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 15.02% return.


AIGI.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.46%
YTD
15.82%
6M
21.54%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
8.39%

AMPS.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.61%
YTD
15.02%
6M
21.12%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AIGI.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals
15.82%19.43%3.07%-11.78%-6.23%
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
15.02%17.34%-0.96%-24.30%-1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGI.L and AMPS.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022

0.88

The correlation between AIGI.L and AMPS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGI.L
AIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGI.LAMPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.63

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

9.11

-2.69

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGI.L and AMPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGI.LAMPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.00

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.00

-0.01

Drawdowns

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -69.67%, which is greater than AMPS.L's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGI.L and AMPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGI.LAMPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.67%

-33.45%

-36.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.83%

-8.83%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.72%

-22.81%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.66%

-4.78%

-19.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.42%

-22.36%

-23.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

3.52%

+1.59%

Volatility

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 4.73%. This indicates that AIGI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGI.LAMPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.73%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

12.73%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

16.05%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

21.59%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.49%

21.59%

-2.10%

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGI.L vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGI.L nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AIGI.L and AMPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AMPS.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMPS.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGI.L.

AIGI.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals, while AMPS.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGI.L and 0.45% for AMPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGI.L and AMPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer