AIFD vs. TSXU
AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AIFD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). AIFD is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
AIFD vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 49.97% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
AIFD
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 17.54%
- YTD
- 49.97%
- 6M
- 50.25%
- 1Y
- 98.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIFD vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 49.97% | 4.78% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIFD and TSXU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIFD vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
AIFD
TSXU
AIFD vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIFD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.44 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIFD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 4.53 | -2.94 |
Drawdowns
AIFD vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIFD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -35.62% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.92% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -10.56% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility
AIFD vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIFD | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 78.68% | -53.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 78.68% | -49.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 78.68% | -49.34% |
AIFD vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIFD vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIFD and TSXU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.
AIFD is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIFD and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for AIFD and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer