PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFD vs. GTEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFD vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 37.01% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 42.08% return.


AIFD

1D
-2.46%
1M
-3.47%
6M
34.00%
YTD
37.01%
1Y
68.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GTEK

1D
-4.38%
1M
-3.33%
6M
34.40%
YTD
42.08%
1Y
59.49%
3Y*
29.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFD vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
37.01%28.30%15.22%
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
42.08%23.68%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and GTEK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024

0.87

The correlation between AIFD and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIFD vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIFD
GTEK

Technology

73.2%
74.5%

Communication Services

11.0%
3.7%

Industrials

9.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.2%

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIFD
73.2%
GTEK
74.5%

Communication Services

AIFD
11.0%
GTEK
3.7%

Industrials

AIFD
9.8%
GTEK
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AIFD
6.0%
GTEK
4.9%

Basic Materials

AIFD

-

GTEK
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

AIFD

-

GTEK

-

Energy

AIFD

-

GTEK

-

Financial Services

AIFD

-

GTEK
1.2%

Healthcare

AIFD

-

GTEK
1.1%

Real Estate

AIFD

-

GTEK
2.3%

Utilities

AIFD

-

GTEK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFD vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFD
AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFD vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIFDGTEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

5.37

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.55

15.79

+2.76

AIFD vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFD and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, smaller than the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and GTEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFDGTEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-53.77%

+20.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-11.13%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.13%

-9.70%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-26.99%

+21.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.78%

-0.09%

Volatility

AIFD vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) have volatilities of 12.59% and 12.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFDGTEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.59%

12.78%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.53%

26.10%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.91%

29.74%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.26%

28.82%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.26%

28.82%

+1.44%

AIFD vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIFD and GTEK have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

AIFD vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIFD nor GTEK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFD and GTEK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTEK has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to AIFD (12.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFD dropped -33.20% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 68.32% vs 59.49% for GTEK. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, AIFD has been the lower-risk option at 12.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 68.32% return vs 59.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIFD and GTEK have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

AIFD and GTEK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Goldman Sachs.

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFD and GTEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer