PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFA vs. MLGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIFA vs. MLGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. (AIFA) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFA achieves a -34.92% return, which is significantly lower than MLGO's -8.37% return.


AIFA

1D
-4.97%
1M
-31.39%
6M
-15.90%
YTD
-34.92%
1Y
-85.83%
3Y*
-36.02%
5Y*
-33.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-33.93%

MLGO

1D
2.66%
1M
1.76%
6M
-18.02%
YTD
-8.37%
1Y
-53.92%
3Y*
-93.37%
5Y*
-85.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.55K$47.72K$477.36K
$143.46K$152.75K$2.19M

AIFA vs. MLGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIFA
All In FutureTech Alliance Inc.
-34.92%-50.56%-25.24%0.95%-38.60%-34.23%
MLGO
MicroAlgo Inc.
-8.37%-96.08%-97.94%-27.04%-87.60%3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFA and MLGO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2021

0.05

The correlation between AIFA and MLGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIFA:

$9.76M

MLGO:

$44.31M

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIFA:

$7.25M

MLGO:

$61.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIFA:

$1.89M

MLGO:

$16.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

AIFA:

-$32.35M

MLGO:

$3.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFA vs. MLGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIFA
AIFA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AIFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFA Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MLGO
MLGO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MLGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLGO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MLGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIFA vs. MLGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. (AIFA) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIFAMLGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.94

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

-0.73

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.03

-0.21

AIFA vs. MLGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFA Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the MLGO Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFA and MLGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIFA vs. MLGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFA drawdown since its inception was -97.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MLGO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFA and MLGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFAMLGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.64%

-100.00%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.73%

-74.15%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.82%

-99.99%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.82%

-100.00%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.64%

-99.99%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.45%

-64.18%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.20%

52.63%

+18.57%

Volatility

AIFA vs. MLGO - Volatility Comparison

All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. (AIFA) has a higher volatility of 18.42% compared to MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) at 16.10%. This indicates that AIFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFAMLGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.42%

16.10%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.67%

70.46%

+17.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.24%

97.12%

+31.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.95%

481.47%

-390.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.65%

467.33%

-373.68%

Dividends

AIFA vs. MLGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIFA nor MLGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AIFA vs. MLGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. and MicroAlgo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFA and MLGO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIFA has higher volatility (18.42%) compared to MLGO (16.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFA dropped -97.64% vs MLGO's -100.00%.

MLGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFA and MLGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer