AIFA vs. MLGO
AIFA (All In FutureTech Alliance Inc.) and MLGO (MicroAlgo Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AIFA in Information Technology Services, MLGO in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, AIFA returned -32.14%/yr vs -85.34%/yr for MLGO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIFA vs. MLGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIFA achieves a -16.62% return, which is significantly lower than MLGO's -8.14% return.
AIFA
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- -16.62%
- 1Y
- -80.78%
- 3Y*
- -30.43%
- 5Y*
- -32.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MLGO
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- 6M
- -24.25%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- -81.16%
- 3Y*
- -93.37%
- 5Y*
- -85.34%
- 10Y*
- —
AIFA vs. MLGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFA All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. | -16.62% | -50.56% | -25.24% | 0.95% | -38.60% | -34.23% |
MLGO MicroAlgo Inc. | -8.14% | -96.08% | -97.94% | -27.04% | -87.60% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIFA and MLGO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between AIFA and MLGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AIFA:
$12.50M
MLGO:
$44.42M
AIFA:
$7.25M
MLGO:
$61.17M
AIFA:
$1.89M
MLGO:
$16.42M
AIFA:
-$32.35M
MLGO:
$3.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIFA vs. MLGO — Risk / Return Rank
AIFA
MLGO
AIFA vs. MLGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. (AIFA) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIFA | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.82 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.95 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.14 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIFA vs. MLGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIFA drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, roughly equal to the maximum MLGO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFA and MLGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIFA | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.63% | -100.00% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.80% | -85.99% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.79% | -99.99% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.79% | -100.00% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.98% | -99.99% | +3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.27% | -63.79% | -4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.34% | 71.19% | -0.85% |
Volatility
AIFA vs. MLGO - Volatility Comparison
All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. (AIFA) has a higher volatility of 22.18% compared to MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) at 20.49%. This indicates that AIFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIFA | MLGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.18% | 20.49% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.08% | 72.94% | +15.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.62% | 101.19% | +27.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.77% | 481.26% | -390.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.81% | 469.79% | -375.98% |
Dividends
AIFA vs. MLGO - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIFA nor MLGO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AIFA vs. MLGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between All In FutureTech Alliance Inc. and MicroAlgo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AIFA and MLGO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIFA has higher volatility (22.18%) compared to MLGO (20.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFA dropped -97.63% vs MLGO's -100.00%.
AIFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIFA and MLGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer