PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIEMX vs. ALBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIEMX achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than ALBAX's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AIEMX has underperformed ALBAX with an annualized return of 7.29%, while ALBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.


AIEMX

1D
3.83%
1M
-5.30%
6M
5.93%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
3.64%

ALBAX

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.39%
6M
9.72%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
26.12%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
14.90%
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIEMX
Alger Emerging Markets Fund
15.08%25.30%5.60%13.49%-32.52%-0.45%37.17%21.98%-21.81%38.72%
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
12.10%19.89%21.81%22.60%-14.12%30.79%15.22%28.92%-4.72%20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AIEMX and ALBAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.67

The correlation between AIEMX and ALBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIEMX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIEMX
AIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ALBAX
ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIEMXALBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.04

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

12.95

-7.06

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the ALBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEMX and ALBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEMX drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than ALBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEMX and ALBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIEMXALBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-40.56%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-7.86%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-17.65%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.15%

-22.06%

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.21%

-34.26%

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.30%

-1.66%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-7.31%

-9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

1.84%

+2.93%

Volatility

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) at 3.23%. This indicates that AIEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIEMXALBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

3.23%

+7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.79%

9.92%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.69%

12.97%

+11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

15.61%

+4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

17.25%

+2.79%

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEMX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIEMX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison

AIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ALBAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIEMX
Alger Emerging Markets Fund
0.04%0.05%0.31%0.00%0.00%4.19%0.00%5.08%2.35%3.58%0.00%0.00%
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
0.72%0.74%1.08%0.98%1.24%4.17%2.55%5.00%6.75%2.35%1.56%3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIEMX and ALBAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIEMX has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to ALBAX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIEMX dropped -46.21% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIEMX and ALBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer