AIEMX vs. FDGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX).
AIEMX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Dec 28, 2010. FDGRX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIEMX Alger Emerging Markets Fund | 0.15% | 25.30% | 5.60% | 13.49% | -32.52% | -0.45% | 37.17% | 21.98% | -21.81% | 38.72% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | -2.70% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIEMX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than FDGRX's -2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AIEMX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 6.57%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.34% annualized return.
AIEMX
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -9.76%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
FDGRX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 20.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIEMX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIEMX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
AIEMX
FDGRX
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIEMX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.88 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.12 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | 7.42 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIEMX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.53 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.88 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIEMX and FDGRX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison
AIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIEMX Alger Emerging Markets Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.19% | 0.00% | 5.08% | 2.35% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIEMX drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEMX and FDGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIEMX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -71.62% | +25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -13.07% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.75% | -40.25% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.21% | -40.25% | -5.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.45% | -8.69% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -15.97% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 3.74% | -0.19% |
Volatility
AIEMX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Emerging Markets Fund (AIEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) at 8.21%. This indicates that AIEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIEMX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 8.21% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 15.30% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 24.68% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 23.97% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 23.33% | -4.06% |