PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBALX vs. HGLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBALX vs. HGLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBALX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly higher than HGLB's -13.14% return.


JBALX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.08%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.01%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
11.26%

HGLB

1D
-1.65%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
-14.10%
1Y
-4.96%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBALX vs. HGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
3.50%15.00%20.78%15.45%-16.56%17.28%14.40%14.45%
HGLB
Highland Global Allocation Fund
-13.14%51.74%-1.52%-6.15%14.53%53.22%-17.98%-31.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JBALX and HGLB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBALX vs. HGLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBALX
JBALX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HGLB
HGLB Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBALX vs. HGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBALXHGLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.97

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

-0.21

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

-0.41

+8.01

JBALX vs. HGLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the HGLB Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBALX and HGLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBALX vs. HGLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBALX drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, smaller than the maximum HGLB drawdown of -70.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBALX and HGLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBALXHGLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-70.40%

+36.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-23.34%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.93%

-23.34%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-29.88%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-22.72%

+22.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-18.20%

+12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

11.99%

-10.09%

Volatility

JBALX vs. HGLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A (JBALX) is 3.52%, while Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that JBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBALXHGLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

6.02%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

12.95%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.21%

21.16%

-11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.41%

22.11%

-10.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

27.62%

-16.33%

JBALX vs. HGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBALX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than HGLB's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBALX vs. HGLB - Dividend Comparison

JBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, less than HGLB's 13.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGLB
Highland Global Allocation Fund
13.91%11.57%14.27%12.82%10.32%9.39%15.44%11.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JBALX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A
8.55%8.80%11.84%2.28%2.00%4.54%2.54%2.33%7.14%4.69%4.55%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBALX and HGLB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGLB has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to JBALX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBALX dropped -33.98% vs HGLB's -70.40%.

JBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBALX and HGLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer