PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBU vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 48.05% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.


AIBU

1D
-4.35%
1M
29.93%
YTD
48.05%
6M
34.98%
1Y
109.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and XTJL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024

0.78

The correlation between AIBU and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIBU vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIBU
XTJL

Technology

26.0%
36.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

0.2%
8.4%

Industrials

0.1%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

AIBU
26.0%
XTJL
36.2%

Communication Services

AIBU
3.6%
XTJL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AIBU
2.3%
XTJL
10.1%

Healthcare

AIBU
0.2%
XTJL
8.4%

Industrials

AIBU
0.1%
XTJL
8.1%

Basic Materials

AIBU

-

XTJL
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

AIBU

-

XTJL
4.9%

Energy

AIBU

-

XTJL
3.5%

Financial Services

AIBU

-

XTJL
11.9%

Real Estate

AIBU

-

XTJL
1.9%

Utilities

AIBU

-

XTJL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBUXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.07

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

17.37

-11.85

AIBU vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBUXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.12

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.65

+0.60

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBUXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-23.24%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

-5.12%

-43.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

0.00%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-4.04%

-9.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.91%

0.90%

+19.01%

Volatility

AIBU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that AIBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBUXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

0.33%

+14.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.96%

5.72%

+31.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.71%

7.43%

+40.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.37%

15.22%

+40.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.37%

15.22%

+40.15%

AIBU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIBU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIBU has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBU dropped -51.17% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, AIBU leads with 109.46% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBU has performed better with a 109.46% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.79% for XTJL.

AIBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBU and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer