AIBU vs. QTAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).

AIBU and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIBU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index. It was launched on May 15, 2024. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.

Performance

AIBU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIBU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	-27.03%	42.25%	38.36%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	1.26%	19.36%	12.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a -27.03% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 1.26% return.

AIBU

• 1D: 9.48%
• 1M: -8.90%
• YTD: -27.03%
• 6M: -31.61%
• 1Y: 36.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 19.73%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

AIBU

Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares

QTAP

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April

Return for Risk

AIBU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU

AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 35
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 80
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIBU	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.22	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.94	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.48	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	1.73	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.86	12.34	-10.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIBU vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIBU	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	1.22	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.62	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and QTAP is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AIBU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	3.07%	2.27%	1.33%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIBU	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.17%	-29.44%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.71%	-12.04%	-36.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.84%	-0.51%	-43.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-5.21%	-8.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.54%	1.68%	+16.86%

Volatility

AIBU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) has a higher volatility of 17.98% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 0.76%. This indicates that AIBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIBU	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.98%	0.76%	+17.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.39%	2.75%	+34.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.01%	16.31%	+43.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.65%	19.02%	+36.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.65%	19.02%	+36.63%