AIBU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIBU (Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AIBU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, AIBU returned 67.41% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIBU charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

AIBU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 24.78% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

AIBU

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -3.16%
• YTD: 24.78%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 67.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	24.78%	26.81%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBU and INTW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.49

AIBU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIBU	INTW
Technology	32.3%	66.7%
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Industrials	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIBU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBU

AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 34
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 26

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIBU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	13.25	-11.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	5.13	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.65	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	40.32	-38.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	91.49	-88.16

AIBU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBU Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIBU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIBU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.17%	-60.58%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.71%	-49.34%	+0.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.38%	-12.49%	-6.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-29.66%	+15.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.26%	21.70%	-1.44%

Volatility

AIBU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) is 21.15%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that AIBU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIBU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.15%	55.81%	-34.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.22%	119.10%	-79.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.36%	150.14%	-99.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.97%	148.88%	-92.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.97%	148.88%	-92.91%

AIBU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIBU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares	1.79%	2.27%	1.33%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIBU and INTW in my portfolio?

AIBU and INTW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIBU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to AIBU (21.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBU dropped -51.17% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, AIBU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 67.41% for AIBU. On fees, AIBU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, AIBU has been the lower-risk option at 21.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIBU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 67.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIBU or INTW?

AIBU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIBU or INTW?

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between AIBU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.