PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBAX vs. DFEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBAX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DFEQX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AIBAX has underperformed DFEQX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while DFEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.93% annualized return.


AIBAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
1.68%

DFEQX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
-0.10%6.83%2.91%4.09%-8.02%-0.89%7.36%4.40%0.92%1.06%
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
1.31%4.27%5.50%5.44%-5.18%-0.60%2.24%4.51%1.34%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBAX and DFEQX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.67

The correlation between AIBAX and DFEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBAX vs. DFEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBAX
AIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEQX
DFEQX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DFEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBAXDFEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.08

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

4.94

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

20.65

-15.24

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the DFEQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBAX and DFEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBAXDFEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

3.50

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.97

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.15

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.14

+0.12

Drawdowns

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBAX drawdown since its inception was -11.42%, which is greater than DFEQX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBAX and DFEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBAXDFEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-8.40%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-0.76%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-1.16%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.33%

-8.40%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.42%

-8.40%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.10%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-0.95%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.18%

+0.53%

Volatility

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) at 0.45%. This indicates that AIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBAXDFEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.45%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

0.89%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

1.07%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

2.08%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.29%

1.69%

+1.60%

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEQX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBAX vs. DFEQX - Dividend Comparison

AIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than DFEQX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
3.86%3.87%4.00%3.01%1.63%0.91%3.25%2.59%1.66%1.21%1.72%1.85%
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
4.13%3.62%4.40%3.34%1.78%1.05%0.47%2.18%3.14%1.51%1.59%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBAX and DFEQX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIBAX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to DFEQX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBAX dropped -11.42% vs DFEQX's -8.40%.

DFEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBAX and DFEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer