AIA vs. VYMI
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50, while VYMI is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIA returned 15.05%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for VYMI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
AIA vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 44.56% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AIA has outperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 15.05%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.
AIA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 44.56%
- 6M
- 50.54%
- 1Y
- 83.79%
- 3Y*
- 34.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
AIA vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 44.56% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 22.21% | -14.22% | 45.00% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.90% | 38.05% | 7.06% | 17.07% | -7.02% | 15.39% | -1.11% | 18.43% | -12.65% | 22.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and VYMI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between AIA and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AIA vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIA
VYMI
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AIA
VYMI
Financial Services
AIA
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
AIA
VYMI
Communication Services
AIA
VYMI
Industrials
AIA
VYMI
Healthcare
AIA
VYMI
Energy
AIA
VYMI
Real Estate
AIA
VYMI
Basic Materials
AIA
-
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
AIA
-
VYMI
Utilities
AIA
-
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
VYMI
AIA vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIA | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.41 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 2.96 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.76 | 11.60 | +8.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIA vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than VYMI's maximum drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -40.00% | -20.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -10.14% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -12.84% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.11% | -24.05% | -26.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | -40.00% | -14.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | 0.00% | -6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -6.30% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.59% | +1.49% |
Volatility
AIA vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 4.40%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | 4.40% | +9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.49% | 11.15% | +13.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.93% | 13.33% | +14.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 14.90% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 16.85% | +6.93% |
AIA vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIA vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than VYMI's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.73% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.39% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and VYMI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIA has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to VYMI (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs VYMI's -40.00%.
On 10-year performance, AIA leads with 15.05% vs 11.24% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AIA has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.
VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.73% for AIA.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.07% for VYMI.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIA and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer