AIA vs. SLV
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIA returned 15.48%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
AIA vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 52.67% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AIA having a 15.48% annualized return and SLV not far ahead at 15.55%.
AIA
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 18.04%
- YTD
- 52.67%
- 6M
- 57.46%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
AIA vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 52.67% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 22.21% | -14.22% | 45.00% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and SLV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2007 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AIA and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AIA vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIA
SLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AIA
SLV
-
Financial Services
AIA
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIA
SLV
-
Communication Services
AIA
SLV
-
Industrials
AIA
SLV
-
Healthcare
AIA
SLV
-
Energy
AIA
SLV
-
Real Estate
AIA
SLV
-
Basic Materials
AIA
-
SLV
Consumer Defensive
AIA
-
SLV
-
Utilities
AIA
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
SLV
AIA vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.94 | 1.89 | +2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | 2.07 | +2.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.35 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.16 | 2.62 | +4.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.55 | 5.64 | +20.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94 | 1.89 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
AIA vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -76.28% | +15.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -42.45% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -42.45% | +20.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.17% | -42.45% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | -42.81% | -11.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -37.30% | +36.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -44.67% | +27.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 19.67% | -15.86% |
Volatility
AIA vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is 11.22%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that AIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 16.30% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.71% | 58.31% | -36.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 58.90% | -33.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 36.15% | -10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 31.84% | -8.29% |
AIA vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AIA and SLV have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
AIA vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.64% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and SLV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to AIA (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 15.48% for AIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, AIA has been the lower-risk option at 11.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIA and SLV have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SLV is Silver. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIA and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer