PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIA vs. RGTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIA vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 44.56% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -5.28% return.


AIA

1D
0.54%
1M
6.70%
YTD
44.56%
6M
50.54%
1Y
83.79%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
15.05%

RGTI

1D
1.70%
1M
17.54%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-18.81%
1Y
84.04%
3Y*
152.06%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIA vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
44.56%47.79%20.26%4.32%-24.08%-16.45%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-5.28%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AIA and RGTI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIA vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIA vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIARGTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

0.96

+4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

1.47

+18.28

AIA vs. RGTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the RGTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIA and RGTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIA vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and RGTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIARGTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.89%

-96.89%

+36.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-77.10%

+62.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-78.83%

+57.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.11%

-96.89%

+46.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-62.76%

+56.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-58.84%

+42.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

49.98%

-45.90%

Volatility

AIA vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is 14.34%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.79%. This indicates that AIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIARGTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

44.79%

-30.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

71.15%

-46.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.93%

109.21%

-81.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

128.97%

-103.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

127.17%

-103.39%

Dividends

AIA vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison

AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.73%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIA and RGTI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to AIA (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs RGTI's -96.89%.

AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIA and RGTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer