PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIA vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIA vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 44.56% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's 28.93% return.


AIA

1D
0.54%
1M
6.70%
YTD
44.56%
6M
50.54%
1Y
83.79%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
15.05%

IONQ

1D
-0.24%
1M
11.36%
YTD
28.93%
6M
14.90%
1Y
52.88%
3Y*
75.90%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIA vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
44.56%47.79%20.26%4.32%-24.08%-10.91%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
28.93%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%50.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AIA and IONQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIA vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIA vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIAIONQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.16

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

0.73

+4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

1.33

+18.42

AIA vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIA and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIA vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.89%

-90.00%

+29.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-67.61%

+53.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-67.61%

+45.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.11%

-90.00%

+39.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-29.53%

+23.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-50.88%

+34.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

37.20%

-33.12%

Volatility

AIA vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is 14.34%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that AIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

31.60%

-17.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

68.80%

-44.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.93%

93.28%

-65.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

100.48%

-74.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

97.53%

-73.75%

Dividends

AIA vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.73%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIA and IONQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to AIA (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIA and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer