PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIA vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIA vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 39.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.63% return.


AIA

1D
-1.15%
1M
-2.58%
6M
27.75%
YTD
39.99%
1Y
66.70%
3Y*
34.25%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
13.43%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

IBIC

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.18%
6M
2.33%
YTD
2.63%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$80.57M$61.03M$75.79M
$985.11K$822.88K$536.84K

AIA vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
39.99%47.79%20.26%1.84%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.63%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AIA and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.04

The correlation between AIA and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIA vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIA vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIAIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.07

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

14.92

-10.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

50.81

-38.48

AIA vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIA and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIA vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.89%

-0.90%

-59.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.83%

-0.27%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-0.12%

-9.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-0.10%

-16.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

0.08%

+5.35%

Volatility

AIA vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

0.23%

+10.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.29%

0.69%

+27.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.68%

0.88%

+30.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

1.54%

+25.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

1.54%

+22.65%

AIA vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIA vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.57%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
4.62%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIA and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIA has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, AIA leads with 66.70% vs 3.98% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIA has performed better with a 66.70% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.57% for AIA.

AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIA and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer