AIA vs. DXJ
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50 Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIA returned 13.49%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for DXJ. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
AIA vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 37.27% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AIA has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 13.49%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.62% annualized return.
AIA
- 1D
- -3.93%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- 6M
- 26.37%
- YTD
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 67.79%
- 3Y*
- 32.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
DXJ
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 54.82%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 27.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
AIA vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 37.27% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 22.21% | -14.22% | 45.00% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 22.23% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and DXJ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2007 | 0.56 |
The correlation between AIA and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AIA vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIA
DXJ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AIA
DXJ
Financial Services
AIA
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
AIA
DXJ
Communication Services
AIA
DXJ
Industrials
AIA
DXJ
Healthcare
AIA
DXJ
Energy
AIA
DXJ
Real Estate
AIA
DXJ
-
Basic Materials
AIA
-
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
AIA
-
DXJ
Utilities
AIA
-
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
DXJ
AIA vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIA | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | 5.02 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 19.10 | -4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIA vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -49.63% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -10.98% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -22.19% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.67% | -22.19% | -26.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | -39.14% | -15.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -2.62% | -8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -14.27% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 2.88% | +1.65% |
Volatility
AIA vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.46% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 6.56%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.46% | 6.56% | +7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.29% | 14.47% | +12.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.55% | 18.30% | +12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 19.06% | +7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 19.93% | +4.10% |
AIA vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIA vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than DXJ's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.60% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.96% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and DXJ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIA has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to DXJ (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.62% vs 13.49% for AIA. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.
AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.96% for DXJ.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50 Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIA and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer