PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYMX vs. GOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) and abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AHYMX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.56%

GOPIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
1.18%2.91%4.07%1.56%-9.36%4.06%1.81%5.23%1.50%4.19%
GOPIX
abrdn China A Share Equity Fund
0.00%25.89%5.70%-24.96%-22.46%-3.67%56.93%31.74%-11.87%35.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYMX and GOPIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.02

The correlation between AHYMX and GOPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYMX vs. GOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYMX
AHYMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AHYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GOPIX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) and abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYMXGOPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYMXGOPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

Drawdowns

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYMXGOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYMXGOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.61%

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYMX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GOPIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHYMX vs. GOPIX - Dividend Comparison

AHYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than GOPIX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
4.56%4.52%3.32%2.21%2.05%2.31%2.74%3.10%3.39%2.82%3.28%3.43%
GOPIX
abrdn China A Share Equity Fund
1.46%1.46%1.29%0.79%0.00%5.22%1.42%4.45%0.41%1.24%1.40%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYMX and GOPIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYMX and GOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer