AHSAX vs. FBTTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX).
AHSAX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. FBTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | -3.73% | 10.14% | 1.17% | -4.26% | -17.04% | 3.26% | 30.99% | 22.02% | 5.71% | 33.06% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 2.18% | 39.21% | 5.08% | 10.43% | -8.22% | -3.35% | 31.82% | 25.39% | -4.19% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHSAX achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than FBTTX's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AHSAX has underperformed FBTTX with an annualized return of 8.44%, while FBTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
AHSAX
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -3.73%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- -2.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
FBTTX
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 55.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHSAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTTX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AHSAX vs. FBTTX — Risk / Return Rank
AHSAX
FBTTX
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHSAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.92 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.52 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.13 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | 12.48 | -6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHSAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.92 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.37 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AHSAX and FBTTX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Dividend Comparison
AHSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.18% | 11.68% | 6.98% | 7.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 1.50% | 1.53% | 6.41% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 21.60% | 8.79% | 7.10% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% |
Drawdowns
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum FBTTX drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHSAX and FBTTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHSAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -63.75% | +17.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -13.58% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.04% | -36.64% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.04% | -39.04% | -6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.98% | -2.61% | -27.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -21.95% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.72% | -0.74% |
Volatility
AHSAX vs. FBTTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) is 5.45%, while Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that AHSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AHSAX | FBTTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 9.37% | -3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 17.02% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 25.99% | -9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 23.31% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 24.58% | -1.20% |