PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHOG.DE vs. L.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (AHOG.DE) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AHOG.DE is traded in EUR, while L.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the L.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHOG.DE achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than L.TO's 6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AHOG.DE has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 8.68%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.22% annualized return.


AHOG.DE

1D
-1.40%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
2.91%
6M
2.35%
1Y
0.56%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
8.68%

L.TO

1D
4.19%
1M
9.42%
YTD
6.27%
6M
6.07%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
31.07%
5Y*
32.23%
10Y*
25.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHOG.DE
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV
2.91%14.64%25.63%-0.35%-8.09%34.40%7.36%7.38%24.22%-4.25%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
6.27%24.39%51.74%12.78%20.87%91.56%-5.17%26.44%46.30%-2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AHOG.DE and L.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.13

The correlation between AHOG.DE and L.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHOG.DE
AHOG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AHOG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHOG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHOG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AHOG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHOG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (AHOG.DE) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHOG.DEL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

1.09

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

2.67

-2.83

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHOG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the L.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHOG.DE and L.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHOG.DEL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.72

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.63

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

1.15

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.92

-0.87

Drawdowns

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHOG.DE drawdown since its inception was -93.44%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHOG.DE and L.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHOG.DEL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.44%

-43.69%

-49.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.33%

-14.39%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-14.39%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.54%

-17.14%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-24.06%

-9.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.78%

-4.68%

-11.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.43%

-8.26%

-39.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

5.86%

+0.12%

Volatility

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (AHOG.DE) is 6.19%, while Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that AHOG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHOG.DEL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.62%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

16.74%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

21.88%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

19.93%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.81%

22.03%

+1.78%

Dividends

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison

AHOG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than L.TO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHOG.DE
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV
3.52%3.39%3.53%4.15%3.62%2.72%4.10%4.40%2.85%3.10%0.00%0.00%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
1.51%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%

Financials

AHOG.DE vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AHOG.DE values in EUR, L.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


AHOG.DE and L.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHOG.DE and L.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer