AHMFX vs. CCCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX).
AHMFX is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Aug 1, 2008. CCCMX is managed by Capital Group. It was launched on Apr 12, 2010.
Performance
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 | -0.48% | 6.03% | 6.45% | 7.04% | -12.44% | 5.49% | 4.61% | 9.12% | 1.80% | 9.09% |
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund | -0.84% | 4.69% | 1.42% | 3.46% | -4.27% | 0.02% | 3.81% | 4.61% | 1.70% | 2.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHMFX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than CCCMX's -0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AHMFX has outperformed CCCMX with an annualized return of 3.39%, while CCCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.
AHMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
CCCMX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHMFX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCMX's 0.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AHMFX vs. CCCMX — Risk / Return Rank
AHMFX
CCCMX
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHMFX | CCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.34 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.72 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.29 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 5.05 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHMFX | CCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.34 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.56 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.59 | +0.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between AHMFX and CCCMX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Dividend Comparison
AHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than CCCMX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 | 4.27% | 5.58% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 2.71% | 3.44% | 3.60% | 3.68% | 3.88% | 4.19% | 3.74% | 4.19% |
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund | 2.35% | 2.51% | 2.39% | 1.71% | 1.11% | 1.61% | 2.35% | 1.95% | 1.97% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, which is greater than CCCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHMFX and CCCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHMFX | CCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.65% | -7.58% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -3.02% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -7.25% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.65% | -7.58% | -10.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -2.56% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -1.65% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 0.77% | +0.92% |
Volatility
AHMFX vs. CCCMX - Volatility Comparison
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) at 0.84%. This indicates that AHMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AHMFX | CCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 0.84% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 1.25% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.45% | 2.93% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 2.29% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 2.41% | +2.12% |