PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCMX vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCMX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than HIMFX's 1.52% return.


CCCMX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.32%
ALL TIME*
1.30%

HIMFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.87%
6M
0.85%
YTD
1.52%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCCMX
Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund
-0.20%4.69%1.42%3.46%-4.27%0.02%3.81%4.61%1.70%1.90%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
1.52%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%4.74%8.92%1.91%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCMX and HIMFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.73

The correlation between CCCMX and HIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCCMX vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCCMX
CCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCCMXHIMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.61

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.88

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

10.12

-7.16

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCMX and HIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCMX drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum HIMFX drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCMX and HIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCMXHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-17.57%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-2.76%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.02%

-6.14%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.25%

-17.57%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-1.87%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-3.13%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.79%

+0.17%

Volatility

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) is 0.68%, while American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that CCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCMXHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.92%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

2.39%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83%

3.09%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.34%

4.85%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.42%

4.57%

-2.15%

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCMX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCCMX vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

CCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than HIMFX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCCMX
Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund
2.63%2.51%2.39%1.71%1.11%1.61%2.35%1.95%1.97%1.41%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
3.91%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCCMX and HIMFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMFX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to CCCMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCMX dropped -7.58% vs HIMFX's -17.57%.

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCCMX and HIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer