PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLPX vs. QMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLPX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than QMHIX's 17.77% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLPX has underperformed QMHIX with an annualized return of 4.76%, while QMHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.74% annualized return.


AHLPX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.24%
YTD
12.66%
6M
15.01%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
4.76%

QMHIX

1D
0.78%
1M
1.31%
YTD
17.77%
6M
21.56%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
5.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
12.66%2.19%1.74%-4.20%16.48%4.67%10.36%0.09%2.15%4.79%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
17.77%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%1.82%-14.44%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLPX and QMHIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.68

The correlation between AHLPX and QMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLPX vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLPX
AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHLPXQMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.16

7.09

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.66

20.87

-1.21

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the QMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLPX and QMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHLPXQMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.70

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.94

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.38

+0.04

Drawdowns

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLPX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum QMHIX drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLPX and QMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLPXQMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-39.37%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-4.83%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-19.06%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-19.06%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.90%

-34.54%

+12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-17.82%

+11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.63%

-0.06%

Volatility

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) is 2.34%, while AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that AHLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLPXQMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

3.69%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

9.70%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

12.74%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

17.35%

-7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

15.51%

-6.00%

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLPX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLPX vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison

AHLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than QMHIX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.17%8.07%0.29%0.63%17.64%7.15%5.14%4.17%1.45%4.07%0.00%3.40%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.74%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLPX and QMHIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHIX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to AHLPX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLPX dropped -21.90% vs QMHIX's -39.37%.

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLPX and QMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer