AHLIX vs. MBXAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AHLIX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5) and MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - AHLIX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by American Beacon, while MBXAX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, AHLIX returned 4.76%/yr vs 7.41%/yr for MBXAX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AHLIX charges 1.53%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for MBXAX.

Performance

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLIX has underperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 4.76%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.41% annualized return.

AHLIX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 4.37%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: 4.76%
• ALL TIME*: 4.14%

MBXAX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.04%
• 6M: 8.41%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 1Y: 17.15%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 7.41%
• ALL TIME*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AHLIX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AHLIX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5	10.28%	2.59%	2.07%	-3.85%	16.94%	5.09%	10.71%	0.44%	2.52%	5.23%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	12.74%	4.13%	13.17%	-0.91%	7.46%	16.62%	-0.72%	13.59%	-2.43%	13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLIX and MBXAX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.37

Return for Risk

AHLIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHLIX

AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MBXAX

MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AHLIX	MBXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.13	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.13	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.05	3.77	+3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.42	14.56	+2.86

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLIX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLIX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, smaller than the maximum MBXAX drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLIX and MBXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHLIX	MBXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.62%	-31.75%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.52%	-3.89%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.62%	-15.66%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-15.66%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.62%	-31.75%	+10.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-2.69%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-4.00%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.05%	+0.39%

Volatility

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.59%. This indicates that AHLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHLIX	MBXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	1.59%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	4.87%	+2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.91%	6.87%	+4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.65%	11.39%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.51%	13.36%	-3.85%

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

AHLIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

AHLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHLIX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5	7.48%	8.25%	0.55%	1.10%	17.63%	7.44%	5.33%	4.47%	1.83%	4.01%	0.00%	3.51%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.43%	2.02%	7.57%	0.00%	3.92%	4.96%	3.07%	3.35%	1.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHLIX and MBXAX in my portfolio?

AHLIX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHLIX or MBXAX?

AHLIX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to MBXAX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLIX dropped -21.62% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.