AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE
AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - AH50.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AH50.DE returned 8.17%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for XEON.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AH50.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for XEON.DE.
Performance
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AH50.DE achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than XEON.DE's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AH50.DE has outperformed XEON.DE with an annualized return of 8.17%, while XEON.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.70% annualized return.
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
XEON.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.70%
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 41.09% | -16.54% | 20.91% |
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.80% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.58% | -0.57% | -0.49% | -0.47% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AH50.DE and XEON.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AH50.DE
XEON.DE
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AH50.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 4.27 | -2.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 69.36 | -64.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 316.53 | -303.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AH50.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 8.94 | -7.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 7.54 | -7.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 1.78 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AH50.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than XEON.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AH50.DE and XEON.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AH50.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -3.71% | -41.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -0.03% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -0.08% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.58% | -0.71% | -37.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | -3.25% | -41.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -0.01% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -0.92% | -15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 0.01% | +2.42% |
Volatility
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 0.04%. This indicates that AH50.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AH50.DE | XEON.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 0.04% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 0.16% | +12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 0.22% | +16.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 0.25% | +22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 0.39% | +22.43% |
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AH50.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XEON.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AH50.DE vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison
AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while XEON.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AH50.DE and XEON.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
AH50.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XEON.DE is Bank Loan. AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD, while XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AH50.DE and 0.10% for XEON.DE.
Find the right allocation for AH50.DE and XEON.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer