AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE
AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - AH50.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AH50.DE returned 8.17%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AH50.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AH50.DE achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AH50.DE has outperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 8.17%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 41.09% | -16.54% | 20.91% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AH50.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.29 |
The correlation between AH50.DE and XDWH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AH50.DE
XDWH.DE
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AH50.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.93 | +3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 2.28 | +10.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AH50.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.70 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.41 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AH50.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AH50.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AH50.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -26.08% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -10.32% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -21.12% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -21.12% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | -26.08% | -19.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -8.51% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -4.82% | -11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 4.20% | -1.77% |
Volatility
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that AH50.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AH50.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 4.81% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 9.51% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 13.69% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 13.43% | +9.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 14.69% | +8.13% |
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AH50.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AH50.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AH50.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
AH50.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AH50.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for AH50.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer