AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE
AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and 9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both China Equities funds - AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD while 9W1A.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AH50.DE returned 12.81%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for 9W1A.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AH50.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for 9W1A.DE.
Performance
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AH50.DE is traded in EUR, while 9W1A.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 9W1A.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AH50.DE achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than 9W1A.DE's -7.09% return.
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -8.48%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 11.52% |
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.08% | 16.00% | 22.66% | -16.84% | -23.09% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AH50.DE and 9W1A.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AH50.DE and 9W1A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AH50.DE
9W1A.DE
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AH50.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.14 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 0.29 | +12.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AH50.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.12 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.11 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AH50.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, smaller than the maximum 9W1A.DE drawdown of -50.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AH50.DE and 9W1A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AH50.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -50.46% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -16.74% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -27.29% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -25.28% | +19.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -27.20% | +10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 8.13% | -5.70% |
Volatility
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) is 5.94%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that AH50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9W1A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AH50.DE | 9W1A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 7.43% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 14.13% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 19.82% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 29.40% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 29.40% | -6.58% |
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AH50.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than 9W1A.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
AH50.DE vs. 9W1A.DE - Dividend Comparison
AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while 9W1A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AH50.DE and 9W1A.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1A.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1A.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD, while 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AH50.DE and 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
Find the right allocation for AH50.DE and 9W1A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer