AGZD vs. FBND
AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. AGZD is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGZD returned 3.19%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. AGZD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
AGZD vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGZD achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AGZD has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 3.19%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
AGZD vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.47% | 4.35% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.31% | 4.65% | 0.18% | 2.62% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGZD and FBND is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | -0.09 |
The correlation between AGZD and FBND shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (5 years) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGZD vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
AGZD
FBND
AGZD vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGZD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.60 | 2.01 | +4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.71 | 5.97 | +14.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGZD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.41 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.12 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.41 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.44 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
AGZD vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGZD drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZD and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGZD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -17.25% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | -2.66% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.71% | -5.94% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.23% | -17.25% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.46% | -17.25% | +8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.82% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -3.35% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.90% | -0.62% |
Volatility
AGZD vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.18% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGZD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 1.23% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 2.75% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 3.80% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 5.92% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 6.10% | -2.38% |
AGZD vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGZD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGZD vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
AGZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.98% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGZD and FBND have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to AGZD (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZD dropped -8.46% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 10-year performance, AGZD leads with 3.19% vs 2.47% for FBND. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 3.19% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.98% for AGZD.
AGZD is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AGZD and 0.36% for FBND.
AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGZD and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer