AGZD vs. COMB
AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. AGZD is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGZD returned 4.32%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for COMB. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AGZD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
AGZD vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGZD achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.22% | 4.35% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.31% | 4.65% | 0.18% | 2.56% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGZD and COMB is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | -0.01 |
The correlation between AGZD and COMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGZD vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
AGZD
COMB
AGZD vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGZD | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 5.08 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.08 | 13.24 | +5.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGZD | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.68 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
AGZD vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGZD drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZD and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGZD | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -33.50% | +25.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | -7.69% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.71% | -11.35% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.23% | -26.63% | +24.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -4.35% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -12.06% | +11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 2.94% | -2.66% |
Volatility
AGZD vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) is 1.03%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that AGZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGZD | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 5.14% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 14.99% | -13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 17.02% | -14.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.59% | 16.70% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 15.13% | -11.41% |
AGZD vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGZD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGZD vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
AGZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than COMB's 7.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGZD and COMB have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZD dropped -8.46% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 11.27% vs 4.32% for AGZD. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.
AGZD is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AGZD and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGZD and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer