AGZ vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AGZ (iShares Agency Bond ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - AGZ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD) while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. AGZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

AGZ vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AGZ

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 1.15%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZ vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF	-0.07%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

AGZ vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZ

AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZ vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	—	—

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.01%	0.00%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	0.00%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	0.00%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58%	0.00%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	0.00%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.03%	0.00%	+3.03%

AGZ vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AGZ vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF	3.73%	3.75%	3.48%	3.14%	1.56%	0.96%	2.25%	2.32%	2.15%	1.58%	1.52%	1.30%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AGZ or IBTE?

On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGZ or IBTE?

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AGZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGZ or IBTE?

AGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between AGZ and IBTE?

AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AGZ and 0.07% for IBTE.