AGZ vs. IBTE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE).

AGZ and IBTE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD). It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. IBTE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. Both AGZ and IBTE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AGZ vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGZ vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF	-0.13%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

AGZ

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: 1.88%

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZ vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

AGZ

iShares Agency Bond ETF

IBTE

iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF

Return for Risk

AGZ vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZ

AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 82
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZ vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	—	—

Dividends

AGZ vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF	3.76%	3.75%	3.48%	3.14%	1.56%	0.96%	2.25%	2.32%	2.15%	1.58%	1.52%	1.30%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.01%	0.00%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	0.00%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	0.00%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGZ	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85%	0.00%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.53%	0.00%	+3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.03%	0.00%	+3.03%