AGRO vs. ABEV
AGRO (Adecoagro S.A.) and ABEV (Ambev S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — AGRO in Farm Products, ABEV in Beverages - Brewers. Over the past 10 years, AGRO returned 2.09%/yr vs -1.37%/yr for ABEV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGRO vs. ABEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRO achieves a 55.07% return, which is significantly higher than ABEV's 27.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRO has outperformed ABEV with an annualized return of 2.09%, while ABEV has yielded a comparatively lower -1.37% annualized return.
AGRO
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -19.70%
- YTD
- 55.07%
- 6M
- 47.63%
- 1Y
- 33.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
ABEV
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 27.13%
- 6M
- 26.62%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- -1.37%
AGRO vs. ABEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 55.07% | -12.37% | -12.39% | 38.60% | 11.50% | 12.94% | -18.76% | 20.26% | -32.69% | -0.39% |
ABEV Ambev S.A. | 27.13% | 45.11% | -30.10% | 8.41% | 2.38% | -4.39% | -32.61% | 21.92% | -37.29% | 35.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRO and ABEV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AGRO and ABEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGRO:
$6.24B
ABEV:
$49.22B
AGRO:
$0.03
ABEV:
$0.99
AGRO:
431.57
ABEV:
3.16
AGRO:
0.14
ABEV:
0.60
AGRO:
4.10
ABEV:
0.56
AGRO:
3.56
ABEV:
0.55
AGRO:
$1.50B
ABEV:
$88.21B
AGRO:
$378.81M
ABEV:
$45.41B
AGRO:
$466.25M
ABEV:
$28.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGRO vs. ABEV — Risk / Return Rank
AGRO
ABEV
AGRO vs. ABEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) and Ambev S.A. (ABEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGRO | ABEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.19 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 4.99 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGRO | ABEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.12 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.05 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | -0.04 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.27 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
AGRO vs. ABEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRO drawdown since its inception was -73.70%, roughly equal to the maximum ABEV drawdown of -74.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRO and ABEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRO | ABEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.70% | -74.04% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.84% | -16.10% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.96% | -38.76% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.34% | -44.58% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.07% | -72.26% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.70% | -42.50% | +22.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -31.84% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 7.07% | +4.75% |
Volatility
AGRO vs. ABEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) is 14.24%, while Ambev S.A. (ABEV) has a volatility of 17.88%. This indicates that AGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGRO | ABEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.24% | 17.88% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.01% | 25.53% | +14.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.08% | 31.46% | +14.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.82% | 30.31% | +11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.73% | 34.31% | +5.42% |
Dividends
AGRO vs. ABEV - Dividend Comparison
AGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than ABEV's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEV Ambev S.A. | 4.97% | 8.10% | 6.10% | 5.26% | 5.36% | 4.38% | 2.67% | 2.51% | 3.79% | 2.57% | 3.41% | 4.32% |
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 2.43% | 4.41% | 3.63% | 2.95% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AGRO vs. ABEV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adecoagro S.A. and Ambev S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGRO vs. ABEV - Profitability Comparison
AGRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a gross profit of 118.57M and revenue of 398.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
ABEV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.58B and revenue of 22.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.
AGRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported an operating income of 27.86M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
ABEV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported an operating income of 5.87B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
AGRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a net income of 40.14M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
ABEV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGRO and ABEV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABEV has higher volatility (17.88%) compared to AGRO (14.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRO dropped -73.70% vs ABEV's -74.04%.
ABEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGRO and ABEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer