PortfoliosLab logo
ABEV vs. DEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABEV and DEO is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ABEV vs. DEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and Diageo plc (DEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

ABEV:

28.47%

DEO:

12.48%

Max Drawdown

ABEV:

-74.20%

DEO:

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

ABEV:

-57.32%

DEO:

-0.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABEV:

$39.59B

DEO:

$64.36B

EPS

ABEV:

$0.16

DEO:

$6.45

PE Ratio

ABEV:

15.81

DEO:

17.89

PEG Ratio

ABEV:

1.50

DEO:

1.92

PS Ratio

ABEV:

0.43

DEO:

3.18

PB Ratio

ABEV:

2.41

DEO:

6.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABEV:

$91.67B

DEO:

$16.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABEV:

$47.17B

DEO:

$9.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABEV:

$19.99B

DEO:

$5.22B

Returns By Period


ABEV

YTD

38.06%

1M

12.44%

6M

24.23%

1Y

16.20%

5Y*

9.74%

10Y*

-5.43%

DEO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABEV vs. DEO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABEV is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABEV is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABEV is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABEV is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABEV is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABEV is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DEO is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DEO is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DEO is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DEO is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DEO is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DEO is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABEV vs. DEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and Diageo plc (DEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ABEV vs. DEO - Dividend Comparison

ABEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than DEO's 3.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
5.14%5.84%5.25%5.37%4.39%2.58%2.51%3.80%2.57%3.75%5.09%5.31%
DEO
Diageo plc
3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABEV vs. DEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEV drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than DEO's maximum drawdown of -0.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEV and DEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABEV vs. DEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

ABEV vs. DEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambev S.A. and Diageo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
22.50B
8.71B
(ABEV) Total Revenue
(DEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABEV vs. DEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambev S.A. and Diageo plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
51.4%
61.8%
(ABEV) Gross Margin
(DEO) Gross Margin
ABEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambev S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.55B and revenue of 22.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

DEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diageo plc reported a gross profit of 5.38B and revenue of 8.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

ABEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambev S.A. reported an operating income of 5.63B and revenue of 22.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

DEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diageo plc reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 8.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

ABEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambev S.A. reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 22.50B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.

DEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diageo plc reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 8.71B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.