PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGRH vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGRH vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRH achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.


AGRH

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.44%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRH vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGRH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
1.78%6.00%5.93%6.40%1.76%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRH and BIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2022

0.06

The correlation between AGRH and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGRH vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRH
AGRH Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AGRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRH Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRH vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGRHBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-166.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

87.91

-85.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.44

355.35

-345.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.94

2,817.77

-2,772.84

AGRH vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRH Sharpe Ratio is 4.41, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRH and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGRHBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41

19.71

-15.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.13

2.78

+0.35

Drawdowns

AGRH vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRH drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRH and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGRHBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-0.78%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-0.01%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.73%

-0.01%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.26%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

0.00%

+0.14%

Volatility

AGRH vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that AGRH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGRHBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.05%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

0.13%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44%

0.20%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.78%

0.26%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.78%

0.26%

+1.52%

AGRH vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGRH vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

AGRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AGRH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.18%4.63%5.17%4.69%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGRH and BIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRH has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRH dropped -1.73% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 3-year performance, AGRH leads with 5.97% vs 4.64% for BIL. On fees, AGRH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AGRH has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGRH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

AGRH has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

AGRH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BIL is Government Bonds. AGRH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for AGRH and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 4.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGRH and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer