PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGRFX vs. ABTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and AB High Income Municipal Portfolio (ABTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRFX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than ABTYX's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX has outperformed ABTYX with an annualized return of 16.62%, while ABTYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.89% annualized return.


AGRFX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.96%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.50%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
16.62%

ABTYX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.15%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.62%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
7.76%10.84%31.50%37.95%-29.65%21.40%35.97%31.11%3.75%33.88%
ABTYX
AB High Income Municipal Portfolio
2.23%5.88%4.64%5.49%-15.49%5.73%5.08%11.31%1.02%10.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRFX and ABTYX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2010

-0.01

The correlation between AGRFX and ABTYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGRFX vs. ABTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRFX
AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ABTYX
ABTYX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ABTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ABTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and AB High Income Municipal Portfolio (ABTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGRFXABTYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.23

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

7.49

-3.27

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the ABTYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRFX and ABTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGRFXABTYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.16

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.11

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.51

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.98

-0.39

Drawdowns

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRFX drawdown since its inception was -61.88%, which is greater than ABTYX's maximum drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRFX and ABTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGRFXABTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.88%

-21.44%

-40.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-3.82%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-9.37%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-21.44%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-21.44%

-13.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.42%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.76%

-3.96%

-11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

1.13%

+3.32%

Volatility

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Volatility Comparison

AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to AB High Income Municipal Portfolio (ABTYX) at 1.53%. This indicates that AGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGRFXABTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

1.53%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

2.94%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

3.95%

+11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

6.06%

+14.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

5.63%

+14.83%

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ABTYX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGRFX vs. ABTYX - Dividend Comparison

AGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%, more than ABTYX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABTYX
AB High Income Municipal Portfolio
4.61%5.93%4.15%3.10%3.91%2.59%3.70%4.27%4.60%4.20%4.48%4.69%
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
15.20%16.37%21.03%7.20%1.69%9.79%5.79%7.80%16.01%9.33%1.03%9.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGRFX and ABTYX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRFX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to ABTYX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRFX dropped -61.88% vs ABTYX's -21.44%.

ABTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGRFX and ABTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer