AGOCX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
AGOCX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund | 3.11% | 23.91% | 13.75% | 9.41% | -11.69% | 20.27% | 5.72% | 21.02% | -7.69% | 14.68% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGOCX achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AGOCX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
AGOCX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGOCX has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGOCX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
AGOCX
CSUAX
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGOCX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.63 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.17 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.36 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | 10.32 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGOCX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.63 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.61 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.55 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGOCX and CSUAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
AGOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund | 9.32% | 9.59% | 10.04% | 9.74% | 9.10% | 5.29% | 9.25% | 12.44% | 23.46% | 5.31% | 1.56% | 12.12% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGOCX drawdown since its inception was -51.84%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOCX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGOCX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.84% | -52.20% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -7.98% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -20.45% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.69% | -35.05% | +0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -4.38% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -8.49% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.83% | +0.56% |
Volatility
AGOCX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that AGOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGOCX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.26% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 6.89% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.36% | 11.48% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 12.89% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 14.89% | +0.91% |