AGNG vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - AGNG tracks the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. AGNG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

AGNG vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AGNG

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: -2.82%
• 6M: -3.18%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: 8.91%

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNG vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF	-7.13%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

AGNG vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGNG	CNCR
Healthcare	90.8%	96.6%
Real Estate	9.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AGNG vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNG

AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 23
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNG vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGNG	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGNG	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	—	—

Drawdowns

AGNG vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGNG	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.58%	0.00%	-30.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.25%	0.00%	-9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	0.00%	-5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGNG	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.77%	0.00%	+13.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	0.00%	+15.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	0.00%	+17.14%

AGNG vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGNG vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF	0.90%	0.88%	0.83%	0.96%	0.49%	0.72%	0.36%	0.83%	1.00%	1.04%	0.45%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AGNG or CNCR?

On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGNG or CNCR?

AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGNG or CNCR?

AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between AGNG and CNCR?

AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AGNG and 0.79% for CNCR.